<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Please Don&#8217;t Share Your Bodily Fluids With the Rest of the System</title>
	<link>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system</link>
	<description>Stories of a Self-published, Entrepreneurial Fiction Author (and Software Guy)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Timothy King</title>
		<link>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7990</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Timothy King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7990</guid>
		<description>Harvey, thanks.

Dave, OAOO. :-)

-TimK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvey, thanks.</p>
<p>Dave, OAOO. <img src='http://blog.jtimothyking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-TimK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nicolette</title>
		<link>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7986</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nicolette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7986</guid>
		<description>In the comment, you wrote "whole entire system." That's redundant, and makes the mass of snot bigger. I suggest "whole system" or "entire system", but not "whole entire system."

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comment, you wrote &#8220;whole entire system.&#8221; That&#8217;s redundant, and makes the mass of snot bigger. I suggest &#8220;whole system&#8221; or &#8220;entire system&#8221;, but not &#8220;whole entire system.&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.jtimothyking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Sugar</title>
		<link>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7952</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Sugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jtimothyking.com/2006/08/11/please-dont-share-your-bodily-fluids-with-the-rest-of-the-system#comment-7952</guid>
		<description>Yes, I've seen this kind of thing.  I usually regain my composure and edit the comment before I finally check in the code.

Recently I saw a similar situation where all kinds of unrelated data was put in an object as private with get and set functions for each item.  What's the point of that?  Did the programmer think that it was now "object oriented"?

But avoiding things like this actually requires some up front design and planning before diving into coding.  And that issue has been a problem for the 30 years I've been in this business.

Happy refactoring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve seen this kind of thing.  I usually regain my composure and edit the comment before I finally check in the code.</p>
<p>Recently I saw a similar situation where all kinds of unrelated data was put in an object as private with get and set functions for each item.  What&#8217;s the point of that?  Did the programmer think that it was now &#8220;object oriented&#8221;?</p>
<p>But avoiding things like this actually requires some up front design and planning before diving into coding.  And that issue has been a problem for the 30 years I&#8217;ve been in this business.</p>
<p>Happy refactoring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
