5 responses to “7 Reasons eBooks Should Be Almost Free”

  1. Paula B.

    I don’t know about ebooks costing nothing to produce, Tim. Leaving aside the issues of layout and design as well as a cover (yes, you still need covers), there’s also formatting the ebooks for the various readers (and/or programming an app, where applicable (I made a pun!). You also have to submit each book for sale at various venues, as well as the metadata.

    Now, were there no ebook babble, this process would be simplified, and perhaps that will be the case some day. But for now, there’s a lot of fiddly stuff, especially if you’ve got illustrations involved. I’ve formatted quite a few e-articles/books for the Kindle, and that can drive you crazy!

    BTW, you will find this Sunday’s writing show ep on this subject interesting. A disgruntled ebook enthusiast speaks out–strongly!

  2. Paula B.

    Hi, Tim,

    Thanks for your very detailed reply!

    Ah, I thought you were talking about fixed costs. You were talking about variable costs. Yes, you’re right about that: it costs nothing to “print” another copy of an ebook.

    Speaking of formatting issues, look at this: http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/450660-O_Reilly_Digital_Distribution_Debuts_at_TOC.php?nid=2286&source=link&rid=16915500. Sounds like a great service, although I can’t tell what the cost is. Will it be affordable for everyone, or just the Random House types?

    And speaking of ebook prices, check this out: http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/ebooks/chart_that_launched_a_thousand_comments_153521.asp.

    I think 99 cents for an ebook is too low. I sell e-articles for that price (you used to have to pay at least $5.00 for an electronic article way back in the day), but books and book-like things I price higher. Never as high as $9.99 because my stuff is so short, although I can imagine pricing robust collections at that level. I do think that Amazon’s $2.99 floor for 70% royalties will raise prices to at least that point. I’ve already been thinking about which items I can raise to $2.99. That 70% is a powerful motivator. If I have to beef up the content to get it, I will. It’s worth the extra work. And everyone wins: customers get better value for their money, and we get better money for our value.

    No, I’m sure they don’t mean you have to offer the book for 94 cents. They mean the price to the consumer. No way does Amazon want you undercutting them. If you sell paper books in their third-party marketplace, you can’t offer them for a lower price on your Web site. That was something we encountered when we had our store, and it really annoyed me. There’s no way a customer is going to come to some little store unless it can offer a better deal than Amazon, so essentially they extort you into giving them a commission.

    🙂

    Paula

  3. Paula B.

    99 cents for an e-novel? No way. Better to give it away. Otherwise it would seem like the novel was junk.

    There has been a lot of backlash to that charg. I agree that it’s way out of whack.

    I agree that what an ebook is worth isn’t necessarily related to its cost. For example, if you can’t resell the book or share it easily, it’s got to be worth less than if you could. However, if there were electronic features of interest to readers that they *couldn’t* get with paper books, the value would increase, perhaps offsetting those negatives.

    I was just reading about the possibility for a publisher to link its books together so that customers could use them the same way you’d use the Web. Now *that’s* value. (I suppose that’s the next thing Google will want to do.)